The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for July 28, 2022

    Ambient office = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 109 nanosieverts per hour

    Mini Bell mushroom from Central Market = 77 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 81 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 866 – New 40-year License Granted For Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility In Spite Of A History of Problems – Part 1 of 3 Parts

    Part 1 of 3 Parts
         The Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility (CFFF) in eastern Richland County of South Carolina makes fuel rods for commercial nuclear fission power reactors. It is one of the only nuclear fuel factories in the U.S. The South Carolina CFFF is considered vital to U.S. nuclear energy production. Despite a history of accidents and water pollution, following years of monitoring, the CFFF won a key approval last Friday to continue operating for another forty years. Federal regulators approved an environmental study that recommends that the CFFF southwest of Columbia be granted a new forty-year license. This virtually assures that the license will be issued this fall.
         The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission had considered issuing only a twenty-year license because of the safety problems and water pollution that have occurred at the CFFF. However, in a federal notice posted on Friday, the NRC stated that its staff had reviewed a list of environmental issues associated with the CFFF and determined that the new forty-year license was justified.
         Westinghouse has been working for eight years to obtain a new operating license for the CFFF which sits on an eleven-hundred-acre site in eastern Richland County about four miles from Congaree National Park. Groundwater contamination and spills of radioactive materials are among the environmental problems that Westinghouse has had at the CFFF. These problems have only increased in recent years. Neighbors of the facility have voiced their concerns with how the factory has operated in the predominantly Black communities.
         Federal agencies, including the Department of the Interior and the Environmental Protection Agency, have added their weight to the chorus of concerns. Last year, the federal agencies said that the new license should not be approved unless an array of environmental problems was resolved. The Interior Department even suggested a twenty-year license instead of the requested forty year license partly because of multiple leaks and spills that have polluted the ground and ground water. The Interior Department oversees the nearby Congaree National Park.
         Westinghouse’s troubles were severe enough that the NRC took the unusual step of conducting two major environmental studies to determine how the plant’s future operations might affect the environment. The first environmental study initially recommended continued operation of the CFFF but was deemed inadequate. The second study that was approved last Friday looked more deeply at the potential effect the plant could have on the surrounding environment if it continues to operate for the next forty years.
    The question has been whether the license should be extended for forty years as Westinghouse has requested or for a lesser amount of time because the environmental and safety concerns. Many of these have surfaced in the last five years. Some environmentalists and people who live near the plant have said that the new license should be for ten or twenty years if it is issued at all.
         Westinghouse has said that it is working to make improvements. Records indicate that it has had fewer problems in the last two years. The company said that it was satisfied with the NRC’s decision. In an email, Westinghouse said, “We are proud of the positive impact that the Columbia fuel fabrication facility has maintained for more than 50 years, and we remain committed to the safety of our employees and our local community. We are pleased with the NRC’s recommendation to renew the facility’s license for another 40 years and look forward to the agency’s final licensing decision for our plant later this year.’’
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for July 27, 2022

    Ambient office = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 101 nanosieverts per hour

    Lemon from Central Market = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 865 – Dispute Over Management Contract For The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         NTS is a subsidiary of Hunting Ingalls Industries (HII). HII is listed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a seventy five percent owner of NTS. The SEC also lists Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos as another subsidiary of HII. This company leads waste cleanup operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory which is a lead shipper of waste to WIPP. That company was a joint venture between HII which owns fifty one percent of the subsidiary and BWXT. BWXT is the same company that partnered with Amentum to form NWP, the previous lead contractor at WIPP.
          HII has not responded to multiple requests from the media for comments regarding its activities in the nuclear industry, its affiliations or reasoning behind its protest of Bechtel contact award. Bechtel was a part owner of Los Alamos National Security (LANS) until 2018 when it was denied an extension of its management contract by the DoE following an accidental radiological release at the WIPP site that led to a three-year shutdown of operations at the WIPP for repairs. The release of radioactive materials into the open air was connected to a drum of waste from Los Alamos that ruptured as mentioned above. This accident contaminated part of the underground storage facilities and lead to elevated radiation levels in the nearby environment.
          Bechtel has declined to comment publicly on the WIPP contract and protest, citing confidentiality requirements of the procurement process. When Bechtel received the contract award, Bechtel Executive Vice President Dena Volvar said that the company was looking forward to executing its mission to address nuclear waste from around the U.S.
         TBRS intends to operate as Salado Isolation Mining Contractor in executing the WIPP contract according to a Bechtel press release. It also plans to use Los Alamos Technical Associates (LATA) as a subcontractor. Volovar said. “The mission to safely dispose of defense-related nuclear waste is vitally important for protecting people and the planet. We’re honored to be entrusted with this mission and look forward to joining the WIPP team and the Carlsbad community.” The press release from Bechtel mentioned that Bechtel had forty-four years of experience managing DoE sites in Kentucky, Tennessee and South Carolina.
         Jack Volpato is the Vice-chair of the Carlsbad Mayor’s Nuclear Task Force. He said that city officials had yet to meet with Bechtel because the WIPP management contract had not been finalized yet. He added that the protest period could generate “uncertainty” among the WIPP workforce which employs mostly local residents of the Carlsbad and Hobbs areas. He also said that workers were unlikely to be affected by the hiring of a new contractor. Volpato said, “It puts an air of uncertainty onto the workers, but it should not impact them. If I was them, I’d want to know who my boss was going to be.” Volpano went on to say that he hoped that the process would result in a contractor who was the “best fit” for the WIPP project and Carlsbad. He added, “We want the best fit for our community, and the people with the best resources to operate the project. We want the project to be a success. If Bechtel is the one, we really want to meet with them to talk about their role.”

  • Geiger Readings for July 26, 2022

    Ambient office = 78 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 101 nanosieverts per hour

    Heirloom tomato from Central Market = 90 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 77 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 864 – Dispute Over Management Contract For The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         I have written before about the Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico. WIPP was constructed to store radioactive waste and irradiated materials from the development of nuclear warheads.
         There has been a serious departure from the original intention of the designers of WIPP that has led to a threat to human health and the environment. The underground storage rooms at the WIPP were supposed to be sealed with foot thick concrete and steel doors when they were full. As the years passed, the operators decided that just a half inch steel door would be sufficient. Ultimately, they stopped sealing filled rooms with anything. As well as internal problems, there have been serious mistakes made by the laboratories sending waste to the WIPP that have also threatened human health and the environment. Los Alamos National Laboratory starting using a new absorbent in barrels of liquid waste which had not been sufficiently tested. This resulted in the generation of flammable gas and an explosion at the WIPP.
         The management of the WIPP was going to be transferred to a new company recently after that company won the bid earlier this month. However, a company which bid on the contract but lost decided to challenge the choice of contractor. This will cause a delay of at three months in the actual transfer of the management of the site.
          Tularosa Basin Range Services (TBRS) is a subsidiary of Virginia-based Bechtel National. It was awarded the management contract valued at $3 billion by the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE). The initial contract is for a four-year term with six one-year extension options. If the contract with TBRS is finalized, the company will replace the Nuclear Waste Partnership (NWP) which is a joint venture between Amentum and BWXT. NWP has been operating WIPP since 2012.
         These activities involve transporting transuranic (TRU) nuclear waste from DoE sites around the U.S. and disposing of the waste in an underground salt mine. The contractor may also be tasked with mining new storage rooms for the waste, completing infrastructure projects and maintaining the repository underground and aboveground infrastructures.
         Upon the award of the contract to TBRS, the DoE initiated a ten-day protest period to allow the losing bidders to contest the choice of TBRS. On July 26th, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) filed a notice that National Tru Solutions (NTS) had chosen to dispute the new contract award. This gave the GAO until November 3rd to issue a ruling before the finalization of any contract for WIPP management. The GAO has thirty days to file a report on the protest. The protestor has ten days after that to issue its comments on the GAO report. The GAO deadline for issuing its final decision on the dispute is sixty days after the protestor’s comments are due. As the contracts are being finalized and the dispute considered, NWP will continue to be the primary contractor at WIPP, overseeing day to day operation at the repository.
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for July 25, 2022

    Ambient office = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 82 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 85 nanosieverts per hour

    Ginger root from Central Market = 132 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 127 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 123 nanosieverts per hour