Part 2 of 3 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
DoE and Inflation Reduction Act
The Biden administration is strongly committed to maintaining the existing U. S. nuclear fleet and bringing innovative, new nuclear-reactor designs to market.
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provides generous production credits for existing nuclear power plants. It also contains added premiums for meeting prevailing-wage requirements. These two credit programs offer a potential thirty-billion-dollar lifeline to struggling plants at risk of early retirement.
The IRA also provides a tax credit for advanced nuclear reactors and a credit of up to thirty percent for small modular reactors (SMRs) and microreactors. Seven hundred million dollars is dedicated to the support of the development of high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU), which is the highly enriched fuel used in many advanced nuclear reactors.
This IRA funding is in addition to the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s six-billion-dollar Civil Nuclear Credit program. This program allows existing U.S. reactors to bid on credits to help support their continued operations. The DoE’s Loan Program Office also has eleven billion dollars in funding for nuclear plants and the nuclear supply chains.
HALEU fuel
TerraPower is a nuclear startup founded by Bill Gates. It has raised seven hundred and fifty million dollars to develop advanced reactors to serve as alternative to the light-water reactors that make up the vast majority of the globe’s civilian nuclear fleet. Last year TerraPower announced that Bechtel will construct its first reactor in Kemmerer, Wyoming. It will be near the site of a coal-fired plant that is scheduled to be closed.
Terra Power and dozens of other advanced nuclear startups utilize a concentrated form of fuel called HALEU. The only current commercial supplier of HALEU is Tenex, a Russian state-owned company. That was not thought to be a great source even before Russia invaded Ukraine.
In the middle of December, TerraPower announced that it has pushed back the date for starting its new reactor because it can no longer depend on HALEU being supplied by Russia. The CEO of TerraPower is Chris Levesque. He said, “Given the lack of fuel availability now, and that there has been no construction started on new fuel enrichment facilities, TerraPower is anticipating a minimum of a two-year delay to being able to bring the Natrium reactor into operation.”
The world’s fleet of light-water reactors runs almost entirely on fuel that has been enriched to up to five percent U-235. It is classified as low-enriched uranium (LEU). In contrast, the vast majority of non-light-water reactor designs in development run on HALEU which is enriched up to twenty percent U-235.
X-energy and SPAC
X-energy is a developer of small modular reactors (SMRs) and nuclear fuel. It is going public with a merger with Ares Acquisition Corporation which is a publicly traded special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC). A SPAC is created to raise capital through an initial public offering for the purpose of acquiring or merging with an existing company.
X-energy is developing an eighty-megawatt high-temperature helium-cooled SMR which burns uranium fuel enriched to about fifteen percent U-235. The fuel is packaged in carbon-coated, billiard-ball sized spheres. In 2020, X-energy received two billion two hundred million dollars in funding as part of the DoE’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program.
In addition, investors have committed one hundred and twenty million dollars in financing for X-energy. That total includes seventy-five million dollars from Ares Management and forty-five million dollars from Ontario Power Generation and Segra Capital Management. These funders join existing strategic investors Dow and Curtis-Wright Corporation.
Once the disreputable domain of pink-sheet over-the-counter stocks, SPACs have become a respectable way for companies to go public without the burden of revenue or the actual due diligence most public companies are subjected to. This has created a variety of public, premarketed renewable-energy startups with high valuations and big pools of cash such as Heliogen, ESS, Eos, QuantumScape and SES. With the arrival of X-energy, a nuclear startup has joined the club.
Please read Part 3 next
Blog
-
Nuclear Reactors 1113 – Highs And Lows Of U.S. Nuclear Industry In 2022 – Part 2 of 3 Parts
-
Nuclear News Roundup Dec 27, 2022
Analyst Looks at Relevance of Nuclear Fusion rigzone.com
Ukraine’s nuclear plants are working at full capacity news.yahoo.com
South Korea’s natural gas demand likely to dip on nuclear startups hellenicshippingnews.com
DOE to conduct radiation detection flights over Las Vegas Strip ahead of New Year’s Eve fox5vegas.com
-
Geiger Readings for Dec 27, 2022
Ambient office = 69 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 104 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 102 nanosieverts per hour
English cucumber from Central Market = 93 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 97 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 81 nanosieverts per hour
-
Nuclear Reactors 1112 – Highs And Lows Of U.S. Nuclear Industry In 2022 – Part 1 of 3 Parts
Part 1 of 3 Parts
In 2022 the U.S. nuclear industry continued to have serious difficulties caused by regulatory, technical and financial problems. It did enjoy solid support from the federal government.
The global nuclear scene faced similar problems. There were plant closings and construction delays that have resulted in the nuclear share of global power generation falling to about ten percent. This was its lowest level since the 1980s, according to the World Nuclear Industry 2022 annual report.
The U.S. generated more nuclear power than any other country on the globe last year. This amounted to about ninety-five gigawatts of capacity. China generated the next highest amount of nuclear power. Construction of new plants has been impeded by cost overruns and schedule delays. Nuclear power generation has been unable to match the plunging costs of natural gas and renewable energy sources. Nuclear power provides a critical twenty percent of U.S. electricity from the ninety-two light-water reactors that were constructed in a construction binge in the 1970s and 1980s.
Some of these plants are struggling financially, many of them are approaching their scheduled decommission dates. The only new large reactors being constructed today are at Plant Vogtle in Georgia. There has been reports of huge cost overruns as well as incompetence and even fraud.
Here are some of the outstanding highs and lows for the U.S. nuclear industry during 2022.
Diablo Canyon
Diablo Canyon is California’s last remaining nuclear plant. It was granted about one billion dollars in support from the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) last November. This funding may permit the two-reactor plant to remain in business.
The nuclear plant had been scheduled to close permanently in 2025. However, there were serious concerns about both greenhouse gas emissions and a potential lack of generating capacity in the state of California. This spurred California legislators to pass a bill in September with overwhelming support to try to extend the life of the plant through 2030. Diablo Canyon supplies approximately nine percent of California’s electricity.
The Brattle Group carried out a study which indicated that keeping the nuclear power plant running could reduce carbon emissions in the state by about forty million metric tons over its extended lifetime. This would supplant power generation that would otherwise most likely be generated by fossil-gas plants.
However, Diablo Canyon faces a reckoning with the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commissions with respect to its license. The plant is also faced with years of deferred maintenance in the run-up to its anticipated retirement.
Plant Vogtle
On October 17, Georgia Power reported that the loading of fuel into the Plant Vogtle Unit 3 reactor core had been completed. This marked an overdue milestone in the bumpy journey to construct and put into operation the two new reactors. During the reported loading of the fuel, technicians, and operators transferred scores of fuel assemblies one by one to the Unit 3 reactor.
The California Power utility issued a press release that read, “Startup testing will begin next and is designed to demonstrate the integrated operation of the primary coolant system and steam supply system at design temperature and pressure with fuel inside the reactor. Operators will also bring the plant from cold shutdown to initial criticality, synchronize the unit to the electric grid and systematically raise power to 100%.” Vogtle Unit 3 is projected to become operational in the first quarter of 2023.
On December 7th, Vogtle’s Unit 4 reactor completed cold hydro testing. This is the penultimate step before hot function testing which is scheduled to begin early in 2023.
The two new Vogtle reactors are the first new nuclear units to be built in the U.S. in more than three decades. Their publicized problems have not been particularly beneficial to the reputation of nuclear power. The project is six years past the original scheduled completion date, and it will cost utility customer over thirty billion dollars which is twice of the original estimated cost. The DoE’s Loan Program Office provided over twelve billion dollars in loan guarantees to help complete the construction of Vogtle’s two new reactors.
Please read Part 2 next -
Nuclear News Roundup Dec 26, 2022
Doomsday warnings for 2023: Risk of nuclear war is at its ‘highest ever’ and the planet is on a ‘highway to climate hell’ dailymail.co.uk
Lapid: Israel will use force to prevent Iran from going nuclear clevelandjewishnews.com
Poland looks to nuclear power to guarantee its energy independence ft.com
Top Putin aide visits Ukraine’s Russian-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant reuters.com
-
Geiger Readings for Dec 26, 2022
Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 113 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 114 nanosieverts per hour
Blueberry from Central Market = 111 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 106 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 88 nanosieverts per hour
-
Geiger Readings for Dec 25, 2022
Ambient office = 138 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 91 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 89 nanosieverts per hour
Avocado from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 120 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 112 nanosieverts per hour
-
Nuclear News Roundup Dec 24, 2022
Israeli Officials Fear U.S. Still Keen on Iran Nuclear Deal Haaretz.com
Israel must do what it can to end Iran’s nuclear program and the regime jpost.com
Putin readies world’s ‘most powerful’ Satan II nuclear missile for ‘combat duty’ foxnews.com
Nuclear chief: IAEA officials to visit Iran soon ifpnews.com
-
Geiger Readings for Dec 24, 2022
Ambient office = 115 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 98 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Tomato from Central Market = 102 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 105 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 97 nanosieverts per hour
Dover Sole from Central = 111 nanosieverts per hour
