Ambient office = 92 nanosieverts per hour

Ambient outside = 83 nanosieverts per hour

Soil exposed to rain water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

Mango from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

Tap water = 103 nanosieverts per hour

Filter water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

Dover sole = 107 nanosieverts per hour

     The U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) has granted Stony Brook University three million four hundred thousand dollars. This is one of eleven nationwide projects seeking to increase the deployment of nuclear power as a reliable source of clean energy and limit the amount of waste produced from Advanced Nuclear Reactors (AR).
     Jason Trelewicz is an associate professor in the Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. He is the leader of the new project funded by the DoE. It is hoped that the project will significantly reduce AR waste burden via improved fuel utilization and reduced uranium loading.
     The Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) funds important energy related projects in the U.S. The “Optimizing Nuclear Waste and Advanced Reactor Disposal Systems” (ONWARDS) program will develop technologies that can help resolve the waste and storage challenges associated AR fuel cycles. The DoE awarded thirty-six million dollars to eleven projects that will collaborate to reduce nuclear waste, support safe and sustainable domestic fuel stocks, and advance the U.S.’ clean energy portfolio.
     Trelewicz said “This is a particularly exciting project as it directly addresses one of the Achilles’ heels of advanced nuclear fission as a baseload energy source – spent nuclear fuel and the long-term disposition of high-level waste. Under the ONWARDS program, our team’s research combines novel fuel and waste forms with a comprehensive systems approach for improving fuel utilization and reducing uranium loading to enable economically attractive fission power with minimal compact reactor waste burden.”
    ONWARDS was unveiled last year as its first program was launched to identify and facilitate technologies for AR used nuclear fuel (UNF) recycling, waste forms, UNF disposal pathways and associated advanced safeguards technologies. 
      U.S. Representative Lee Zeldin said, “Stony Brook University is leading the way in so many fields that are strengthening our nation. This initiative is no different, developing a comprehensive new approach to better understand the performance of new fuel and waste forms and ultimately reduce nuclear waste more efficiently than even state-of-the-art technologies. The December 2020 appropriations legislation I strongly supported will pay for this critical research.”
     Nuclear power is a reliable source of energy in the U.S. It is also the largest domestic source of clean energy, and it provides about half of the U.S.’ carbon-free energy. That amounts of about one fifth of all U.S. electricity. Nuclear power production, however, produces radioactive waste which must be disposed of by safely storing it in a permanent repository. Mitigating these waste and storage concerns will support the goals outlined in U.S. President Joe Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to support the equitable expansion of the nation’s clear energy sources, including nuclear energy.
U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer M. Granholm said, “Developing novel approaches to safely manage nuclear waste will enable us to power even more homes and businesses in America with carbon-free nuclear energy,” said U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer M. Granholm. “ARPA-E is doing just that by supporting companies and universities that are working on next-generation technologies to modernize advanced reactors and strengthen the nation’s clean energy enterprise.”

Ambient office = 90 nanosieverts per hour

Ambient outside = 103 nanosieverts per hour

Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

Lemon from Central Market = 94 nanosieverts per hour

Tap water = 85 nanosieverts per hour

Filter water = 72 nanosieverts per hour

Part 3 of 3 Parts (Please read Parts 1 and 2 first)
     It is likely that the money was paid out for the servicing of Russian nuclear weapons. The question is whether or not the work was actually done. So what if tritium has not been put in Russian nuclear warheads? If nuclear weapons are ever used in quantity, that would be the end of civilization and no one will be looking for the people who were supposed to be servicing the warheads. Aside from Putin’s belligerence, Russia’s command and control systems do seem to conform to the doctrines of Mutually Assured Destruction which requires some confirmation of an incoming nuclear strike before the nuclear footballs go active to allow a strike to be ordered.
     With respect to the theft of tritium, it is fungible. It is used for many industrial and scientific applications. It would not be hard to fence or perhaps it would not have been purchased in the first place.
      The teams that load the tritium into the warheads would not be the only ones you would have to buy off. There is also the question of what happens to the tritium that was in the warhead before it was serviced. The old tritium would be mixed with helium. The maintenance team has to extract the old gas in the warhead before the new tritium can be injected. The old gas mixture has to be taken to someplace where it can be reprocessed because that is a way to recover some of the tritium costs. So, the reprocessors would also have to be bought off. However, reprocessing this gas is easy because the helium and hydrogen-3 are chemically different. The gas mixture is burned, the helium is released and the tritated water is electrolyzed to make pure tritium again. It is not a major industrial operation.
     Would it be possible to buy off all these people if you were the oligarch in charge of the maintenance program? If you received thirty million dollars in annual income from nuclear warhead maintenance, there would be plenty of money for bribes. There would be little chance that tritium theft would ever be dis covered. How could anyone find out that alpha-emitting gas (alpha particles can’t even penetrate a sheet of paper much less a bomb casing) that are supposed to be in the bomb is not actually there.
     Such a tritium grift could start with just some of the nuclear warheads in the arsenal. A nuclear nation does not really need forty-five hundred bombs to deter attacks by other nuclear powers. China only ever bothered to build a few hundred nuclear warheads. Even a few nuclear warheads falling on major industrial, military and population centers would destroy any country on Earth. Any oligarch who was working a tritium grift would be tempted to keep stealing more and more tritium as the years went by. It would be a tempting target for a corrupt oligarch who was charged with maintaining a nuclear arsenal.

Ambient office = 88 nanosieverts per hour

Ambient outside = 09 nanosieverts per hour

Soil exposed to rain water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

Ginger root from Central Market = 116 nanosieverts per hour

Tap water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

Filter water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

Part 2 of 3 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
     Tritium has a half-life of twelve and a half years. So, it decays as time passes. Worse yet, its decay product is helium-3 which absorbs neutrons. It is critical that the boosting gas in a nuclear warhead is periodically refreshed. The exact interval for nuclear armed nations to refresh the tritium in their warheads is a closely guarded, classified secret. However, there is broad agreement between nuclear scientist that it is at most every ten years, and unlikely to be less than five years for practical reasons. Whatever the interval required, it is a simple matter of math to calculate that every bomb needs about two tenths of a gram of new tritium per year on average. Tritium costs thirty thousand dollars a gram.
     This means that, with forty-five hundred nuclear warheads, it should cost Russia on the order of thirty million dollars per year to maintain its nuclear arsenal. Even if they don’t keep the reserve warheads topped off with fresh tritium until they are needed, you have to have enough tritium on hand to fill them if they are needed immediately. So, whether or not you put the tritium in the bombs or not, it is a cost just to keep them available for service. Small tactical battlefield nukes are just as expensive to maintain as a full-sized hydrogen bomb that can destroy a whole city.
      Thirty million dollars is not a lot of money for Russia. But it is a lot of money for an individual if you can manage to steal it. For that reason, it is not unlikely that tritium intended for maintenance on nuclear warheads may have been stolen in Russia.
     Assuming a ten-year service interval, Russia needs to service about two bombs per workday to keep its arsenal fresh. The teams that do this maintenance are probably small. It would not require more than two to four people to service something the size of a bowling ball. A lot of teams are not needed. Two or three teams would probably be sufficient. The staff who do the maintenance work are very highly skilled and security cleared for such work.
    Every time one of these maintenance teams walk into a room to service a nuclear warhead, they carry a canister about the size of a fire extinguisher holding about eight grams of tritium. (You need enough to put in the bomb so that that ten years later, when it is next serviced, it will still have enough tritium to successfully ignite the expected explosion.) Each canister is worth about a quarter million dollars.
    Russian army ‘meals ready to eat’ (MREs) with an expiration date of 2015 can still be purchased on the international black market. Russian armored personnel carrier tires are failing in the field because they are cheap knockoffs of good tires and they aren’t being maintained properly. Russian tanks have to be regularly serviced and some of the problems with the Russian invasion have involved tanks that stalled on the road in Ukraine due to poor maintenance. Given this record, it is logical to believe that proper maintenance on nuclear warheads may not have been carried out in Russia.
Please read Part 3 next

Ambient office = 63 nanosieverts per hour

Ambient outside = 94 nanosieverts per hour

Soil exposed to rain water = 95 nanosieverts per hour

Blueberry from Central Market = 80 nanosieverts per hour

Tap water = 83 nanosieverts per hour

Filter water = 66 nanosieverts per hour