The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 28, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Dec 28, 2021

    Ambient office = 136 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 64 nanosieverts per hour

    Tomato from Central Market = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 64 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 763 – No Nuclear Weapons Escaped Russian Control After The Fall Of The Soviet Union – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Weapons 763 – No Nuclear Weapons Escaped Russian Control After The Fall Of The Soviet Union – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         When the Soviet Union fell apart in 1991, there was a great fear that some of the nuclear warheads in Soviet satellite nations might fall into the hands of terrorists. Dick Cheney said that there were at least two hundred and fifty nuclear warheads that might possibly disappear. However, to date, not one Soviet nuclear weapon has been discovered outside of Russian control.
        The Cold War ended with a whimper rather than a bang when the Soviet Union fell thirty years ago. Many had dreamed of this day but were surprised when it actually came to pass. The good news was that the Soviet Union, the biggest threat to the U.S., was now just a part of history. However, the big question was what would happen to the giant Soviet nuclear arsenal that was now left in Russia and fourteen other nations that had achieved independence from the Soviet empire.
         If there was a struggle for operation control of the intercontinental ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads left in the Ukraine and aimed at the U.S. targets, would some of them be accidentally or intentionally launched? How many of the thousands of tactical nuclear warheads left from the Soviet arsenal would become “loose nukes” and wind up for sale on the international black market?
         From the perspective of the U.S., the past thirty years have seen many failures and disappointments in our relationship with Russia and other former Soviet states. Russian troops are massing at the Ukrainian-Russian border again. Putin is making extreme demands of western nations which the U.S. and NATO will most certainly reject. There is a real chance that the months ahead will see a bloody war in Ukraine.
         Is there any positive news for the U.S. from the Russian front? In order to answer that question, it is useful to look back over the last thirty years and speculate on just what could have happened between the two nuclear superpowers. What matters most to U.S. national interests? The planners of U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War said that the core interest of the U.S. was to “ensure the survival of the United States as a free nation with our fundamental institutions and values intact.”  This continues to be the focus of U.S. foreign policy. Events on the Russian front that could have had the greatest impact on U.S. most vital interests derived from the fact that Russia has a nuclear arsenal that could easily destroy the U.S.
         A good question to ponder is what could have happened to the Soviet nuclear arsenal in December of 1991 when the Soviet Union collapses? On the television program Meet the Press, then Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney was asked this question two weeks before the Soviet Union fell. He answered, “If the Soviets do an excellent job at retaining control over their stockpile of nuclear weapons and they are 99% successful, that would mean you could still have as many as 250 that they were not able to control.”
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 27, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Dec 27, 2021

    Ambient office = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 69 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 70 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 77 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 26, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Dec 26, 2021

    Ambient office = 116 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 81 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 103 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 25, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Dec 25, 2021

    Ambient office = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 103 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Carrot from Central Market = 62 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 69 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover sole = 101 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 832 – New Mexico Gets Funding For Nuclear Activities From Defense Spending Bill

    Radioactive Waste 832 – New Mexico Gets Funding For Nuclear Activities From Defense Spending Bill

         New Mexico has many federal facilities that deal with nuclear weapons, nuclear research and nuclear waste. The state will receive millions of dollars this year from an annual bill that supplies funding for national-defense-related facilities across the U.S. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was passed by both the U.S. House and Senate. It was sent to President Biden for his signature. The NDAA will provide federal dollars to military installation and initiatives for Fiscal Year 2022. It will also set spending plans and priorities for the next year.
         U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich is a democratic Senator for New Mexico. He sits on the Armed Services Committee in the Senate. He said that this year’s NDAA would benefit New Mexico by providing dollars to many of New Mexico’s federal projects, boosting its economy and making his state a “leader” in national defense. “These provisions, among many others, benefit New Mexico’s economy, and advance our state’s position as a leader in national security for years to come.”
    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
         The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is the only deep geological repository for nuclear waste produced by weapons research and production in the U.S. It is located near Carlsbad. Low-level transuranic (TRU) waste consists of clothing and equipment irradiated during nuclear activities. It is shipped to WIPP from facilities across the nation and buried in an old salt mine about two thousand feed underground.
         The NDAA authorizes about four hundred and thirty million dollars to operate the WIPP. This amount includes fifty-five million dollars for the repair of the WIPP ventilation system This is part of a three hundred million dollar rebuild of the WIPP known as the Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System. Another twenty-five million dollars will support ongoing work on a new utility shaft at the facility.
    Los Alamos National Laboratory
         The Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in Los Alamos is a primary facility for U.S. plutonium research. It is the home of the development of nuclear weapons and other defense-related projects. The facility has had problems in recent years which triggered calls from the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) to address groundwater contamination originating from the site.
         About one billion dollars was provided to the LANL by the NDAA to support its ongoing plutonium research and production of plutonium pits. These pits are used as the trigger for nuclear weapons. The funding supports personnel, equipment and other work at the lab to meet its pit production quotas for the next five years. Six hundred and sixty million dollars are allocated for plutonium operations and three hundred and fifty million dollars for pit production. Three hundred and thirty-eight million dollars are included in the NDAA for nationwide environmental cleanup. Two hundred and seventy-five million dollars will go to Los Alamos. Another fifty-eight million dollars will go to its excess, unused facilities.
    Sandia National Laboratory
         Sandia National Laboratory near Albuquerque conducts nuclear research and develops technologies for the rest of the country. The lab also supports the federal nuclear stockpile through research and modernization efforts. The SNL is managed by the National Nuclear Security Administration which received about sixteen billion dollars in the NDAA including funding for Sandia’s engineering, science and systems integration programs. Another fourteen billion dollars is included in the NDAA for a project to develop new power sources at the lab.