The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Oct 19, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Oct 19, 2021

    Ambient office = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 117 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 111 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 826 – A New Chamber Is Being Dug At The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant In New Mexico

    Radioactive Waste 826 – A New Chamber Is Being Dug At The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant In New Mexico

         The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is a federal facility in an old salt mine near Carlsbad, New Mexico. The plant was completed about twenty years ago and put into operation to receive shipments of radioactive waste from national laboratories and nuclear weapon production facilities around the U.S. The waste includes special boxes and barrels packed with lab coats, rubber gloves, tools and debris contaminated with plutonium and other radioactive elements. No liquid is allowed in the drums that are shipped to WIPP.
          The WIP has been operating for over two decades and has received almost thirteen thousand shipments. It is believed that the shifting salt in the old salt mine will eventually encapsulate the waste after the underground chambers are filled and sealed.
          In 2014, a barrel from the Los Alamos National Laboratory was treated with a new absorbent that had not been sufficiently tested. The chemical processes in the barrel generated hydrogen gas which accumulated and eventually exploded. Problems with the air conditioning and filters allowed radioactive materials to escape from repository into the surrounding countryside.
          The incident slowed down the federal government’s cleanup program. It also prompted policy changes at national laboratories and defense related sites around the U.S. New Mexico state regulators are considering a permit change that some critics say could make expanded operations at the WIPP possible. A final decision is expected later this year.
          The WIPP was closed for three years while expensive cleanup and repairs were carried out. The repository is operating again. Lack of space became a serious concern following the 2014 event because some areas of the mine had to be close off.     
         The U.S. government has been mining a new chamber called Panel 8 at the WIPP. The new chamber took seven years to dig and will be put into use beginning next year. Workers still need to run power lines to the newly excavated. Air monitors and chain link to protect the walls also need to be installed.
         Reinhard Knerr is a manager with the Department of Energy’s Carlsbad Field Office. He said that the completion of Panel 8 had taken a long time, but it will be ready just in time because Panel 7 is expected to be full by next April.
          The rooms that make up Panel 8 are three hundred feet long, thirty-three feet wide and fifteen feet high. Operators say that laser measuring devices were used to guide the mining machines that cut the salt. Big trucks were used to take the removed materials to a hoist that moved them to the surface. More than one hundred fifty-seven thousand tons of salt were mined during the Panel 8 project.
          The next project at the WIPP will be for the mining machines to carve out passageways that will connect Panel 8 to a utility shaft that is currently under construction.
          There have been a number of incidents at national laboratories and at the WIPP which suggest that regulations have not been followed properly in the operation of the repository. Hopefully things will run more smoothly in the future at the WIPP.

  • Geiger Readings for Oct 18, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Oct 18, 2021

    Ambient office = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Gala Apple from Central Market = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 112 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 105 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Oct 17, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Oct 17, 2021

    Ambient office = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Shitake mushroom from Central Market = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 23 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 107 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Oct 16, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Oct 16, 2021

    Ambient office = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 109 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 89 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 76 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover sole – Caught in USA = 100 nanosieverts per hour

     

  • Radioactive Waste 825 – Tritium Exposure – Part 3 of 3 Parts

    Radioactive Waste 825 – Tritium Exposure – Part 3 of 3 Parts

    Part 3 of 3 Parts (Please read Parts 1 and 2 first)
         The production of tritium is not usually a goal in existing nuclear reactors, but it does occur as a side product in pressurized water reactors (PWRs) which utilize boric acid as a neutron poison in their primary cooling loop. This is done to help moderate the nuclear fission chain reaction. Boron-10 can sometimes capture a neutron and produce helium-4 and tritium. In heavy water reactors such as the CANDU, deuterium can also capture neutrons and convert into tritium.
           Most of the tritium that is produced in the reactor’s primary cooling loop remains there and is eventually removed for commercial and research purposes. Because tritium is a hydrogen isotope, it also has the capability of hydrogen to escape attempts to contain it. Nuclear reactors have a problem containing the tritium inside the primary cooling loop.
          Generally, the place where some tritium migrates into the secondary cooling loop is through the heat exchanger. These are devices where heat transfer efficiency is very important. This means that the walls of heat exchangers are usually made of thin nickel alloy. Although, these alloys are resistant to embrittlement by hydrogen diffusion, these heat exchangers do allow some hydrogen to pass through. This hydrogen winds up at the turbines and in the cooling water that is either released into a nearby body of water or into the atmosphere in a cooling tower.
         Since HWRs and PWRs produce a significant amount of tritium in normal operation in their primary loops, this means that relatively more hydrogen including tritium will migrate into their secondary cooling loop. New alloys being developed for heat exchangers may reduce the amount of tritium in the secondary loop. More effective capture mechanisms may allow even the low amounts of tritium in the secondary loop to be removed.
         All of these issues will also be of importance in the development of future fusion reactors. Many of these reactor designs utilize a deuterium-tritium fuel mixture. There are also increasing uses of hydrogen in industrial and other applications. Containing hydrogen isotopes is critical regardless of whether it is merely a waste product as it is in fission reactors, or an ingredient in an industrial process, a fuel or an energy carrier.
         Many analysts feel that the most harmful part of the use of the LNT model is that it may create the illusion that a world with zero radiation is somehow possible or, at the very least, highly desirable.
         The release of tritium by nuclear fission power plants and other artificial sources such as discarded tritium-based batteries and self-illuminating signs is undesirable. There needs to be more research into ways to limit its impact but that is not a significant issue. We live on a planet with radioactive materials in the soil, water and atmosphere, and the atmosphere also protects us from cosmic rays and other radiation hazards.
          Research will continue into different models of the dangers of radiation exposure and time will tell whether the LNT or LDR are more accurate ways of modeling the risks of radiation exposure.