The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 13, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 13, 2024

    Ambient office = 71 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 71 nanosieverts per hour

    Crimini mushroom from Central Market = 125 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 150 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 140 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 98 – Russia Fusion Research Agency Working On Design Of A New Russia Fusion Reactor

    Nuclear Fusion 98 – Russia Fusion Research Agency Working On Design Of A New Russia Fusion Reactor

         The preliminary design of Russia’s proposed tokamak with reactor technologies (TRT) nuclear fusion reactor has been completed by JSC NIIEFA which is the primary nuclear fusion research organization in Russia.
         The project is part of the federal KP RTTN project to develop technologies for controlled nuclear fusion and innovative plasma technologies. It is being carried out by specialists at JSC NIIEFA for Rosatom’s Department of Scientific and Technical Programs and Projects,
         Rosatom describes the TRT as a “tokamak with a long discharge pulse, a strong magnetic field and an electromagnetic system made of a high-temperature superconductor … the construction of the TRT is an important stage in the development of controlled thermonuclear fusion and the creation of a nuclear power reactor in Russia – an environmentally friendly source of energy with virtually inexhaustible fuel resources”.
         The draft design details the fundamental design solutions and a general idea of the structure, dimensions and operating principles for the TRT as well as the technical requirements for the external systems of the tokamak including the power supply, cryogenic cooling, water cooling, vacuum pumping and maintaining operating pressure. The TRT is intended to play a key role in Russia’s plan to develop future nuclear fusion and/or fusion-fission hybrid power reactors.
         Alexey Konstantinov is Deputy Director and Chief Designer of NTC Sintez. He said, “The preliminary design of a tokamak with reactor technologies developed at JSC NIIEFA is a major milestone … acceptance of the preliminary design marks the start of further work on the creation of the TRT both at JSC NIIEFA and at other research centers, institutes, and enterprises … the results of the work performed provide the opportunity to move on to the next stage – the development of the technical design of the TRT.”
         Sergey Gertsog is the Director General of NIIEFA. He said, “The implementation of such a project will provide a virtually unlimited source of clean and safe energy and significantly reduce dependence on fossil fuels, as well as reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Possession of such technologies will raise the country to a new level of technological development and attract investment in research and development, which will contribute to the development of related industries, such as materials science, cryogenic technology and supercomputers, and the creation of new jobs.”
         The preliminary design work for the TRT started in 2022 and depends, among other things, on experience and knowledge gained from the multinational ITER project to build a fusion plant in southern France. Rosatom comments that “at the same time, a large number of new technologies that do not exist anywhere else in the world will be tested for the first time at TRT”. A published concept paper describes the project as being “developed to facilitate fast and economically sound transition to the pure fusion reactor as well as to the fusion neutron source for the hybrid fusion-fission system”. The goal is to build the TRT by 2030.

    Rosatom
     

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 12, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 12, 2024

    Ambient office = 1021 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 126 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 120 nanosieverts per hour

    Campari tomato from Central Market = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 83 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1452 – General Matter Is Working On The Production Of HALEU Nuclear Fuel In The U.S.

    Nuclear Reactors 1452 – General Matter Is Working On The Production Of HALEU Nuclear Fuel In The U.S.

         Scott Nolan worked at SpaceX engineer before he became the CEO of a startup named General Matter. He is on a mission to help end Russia’s monopoly on a special type of more-enriched nuclear fuel for advance nuclear fission reactors by producing it at commercial scale in the United States and slashing its costs.
         Nolan incorporated San Francisco-based General Matter this year for the purpose of producing high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU, for a variety of planned nuclear power reactors including small modular reactors, or SMRs, that backers hope will take off in the 2030s.
         HALEU is uranium enriched to between five percent and twenty percent, which backers say has the potential to make new high-tech reactors more efficient. The uranium fuel used in current nuclear power reactors is enriched to about five percent. Big Tech companies such as Amazon have plans to construct new reactors to serve power-hungry data centers.
         Nolan told an interviewer in his first media interview since forming the company that “We believe HALEU is the most urgent need in the market today, and the most sensitive to enrichment cost. We are focused not only on bringing back domestic capacity, but on bringing the cost down significantly.”
        The long-term goal of General Matters is to cut the cost of HALEU enrichment in half according to Nolan. Today, HALEU is made primarily in Russia, and its price is volatile. Current estimates range from twenty-five thousand dollars to thirty-five thousand dollars per kilogram of enriched uranium.
         The U.S. Department of Energy in October awarded initial contracts to four companies including General Matters seeking to produce HALEU in the United States. This is part of an initiative to kick start domestic production. The U.S. plans to award two billion seven hundred million dollars in contracts for HALEU production, subject to approval of Congress in coming years.
         General Matter currently has no infrastructure to make uranium fuel. It will face stiff competition from other companies who do have experience and facilities in the uranium industry.
        The other companies receiving U.S. support are: Urenco USA, a European firm with operations in New Mexico; Orano USA, based in Maryland with global headquarters in France; and Centrus Energy’s subsidiary American Centrifuge Operating.
         Critics of the use of HALEU have claimed that the level of its enrichment means it is a nuclear weapons proliferation risk, and they recommend limiting its enrichment to ten to twelve percent. Nolan said his company will look to regulators to determine the level of desired enrichment.
         Nolan said he hopes that nuclear fission energy production “should and will be” an important part of Trump’s efforts to expand sources of baseload electricity.
         Nolan worked at SpaceX from 2003 to 2007. He added that his company’s planned HALEU production will share SpaceX’s focus on developing new technology and cutting costs.
         Nolan said that “SpaceX combined people from Silicon Valley in the software startup industry with the aerospace industry, and converged these two skill sets. We’re doing something similar, where we have deep experience on the team from the fuel cycle in the nuclear space, and are combining it with experience from the technology industry to rethink the problem and come at it from a new direction.”

    General Matter

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 11, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 11, 2024

    Ambient office = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 81 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 97 – Acceleron Fusion Researching Low Temperature Muon Catalyzed Fusion

    Nuclear Fusion 97 – Acceleron Fusion Researching Low Temperature Muon Catalyzed Fusion

          As global energy rises, both public institutions and private companies have increased their efforts toward nuclear fusion. Acceleron Fusion is a start-up working on muon-catalyzed fusion energy. The fusion energy firm has recently secured twenty-four million dollars in funding to develop a revolutionary approach to clean energy production. The funding follows a major technical milestone that was achieved by Acceleron in October.
         The company successfully operated its experimental fusion reactor with highly compressed deuterium-tritium (DT) fuel for twenty-eight continuous hours, following over one hundred hours of testing with deuterium. This achievement signals significant progress toward demonstrating the viability of muon-catalyzed fusion as a clean and abundant energy source.
         Acceleron Fusion is working on a radically different reactor design from many other companies working on fusion energy. The company is not using the extremely high temperatures that are common in fusion experiments. Instead, Acceleron is working on a method that uses much lower temperatures. Their new method utilizes particles called muons.
         Muons are similar to electrons, but they are about two hundred times heavier. They are produced when protons and neutrons collide. This creates particles called pions which then decay into muons. Muons can be generated artificially by firing an ion beam from a particle accelerator into a target which is typically made of carbon or some metal.
         When a beam of muons is directed at a highly compressed pellet of deuterium and tritium, the muons facilitate fusion reactions at temperatures much lower than those required in traditional fusion reactors.
         Traditional fusion approaches, such as magnetic confinement and inertial confinement, require enormous heat to create plasma. This plasma must then be contained and compressed with powerful magnets or lasers, which are complex and energy-intensive.
         Acceleron’s technology bypasses these requirements by operating below one thousand eight hundred and thirty-two degrees Fahrenheit.  Operating at this cooler temperature potentially offers significant advantages in efficiency and safety.
         According to a company in a press release, “Traditional fusion machines require extreme temperatures of one hundred and eighty million degrees Fahrenheit. Acceleron’s technology uses muons to achieve fusion reactions at temperatures below two thousand degrees Fahrenheit.”
         However, muon-catalyzed fusion presents a number of unique challenges. Particle accelerators which are used to generate muons, consume a lot of energy.
         The company added that “In the mid-1980s, several groups worldwide demonstrated more than one hundred fusion reactions per muon, raising the possibility that the process could be used to generate energy. However, calculations done at the time concluded that it would take more energy to power the muon source than could be released by the fusion.”
         In order to achieve net energy gain, each muon must catalyze many fusion reactions. Furthermore, muons are short-lived, and they decay in just two and two tenths microseconds. About one percent of the time, they stick to other particles produced during fusion and become unusable.
         The press release added that “Acceleron is developing an intense, high-efficiency muon source to produce beams of muons using significantly less energy than current facilities, and a high-density fusion cell to allow each of these muons to catalyze larger numbers of fusion reactions.”
         To increase the number of fusion reactions per muon, Acceleron compresses the fuel in a diamond anvil to pressures between ten thousand and one hundred thousand pounds per square inch. This is far beyond the pressures that they used in previous experiments.
         Acceleron Fusion is not the only company working on nuclear fusion energy research. A number of other companies across the world have been testing several different approaches, including magnetic confinement fusion, inertial confinement fusion, and even other variations of muon-catalyzed fusion. However, according to experts, it might take many more years before fusion power becomes a reliable source of energy.

    Acceleron

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 10, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 10, 2024

    Ambient office = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 154 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 159 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 71 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 120 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 106 nanosieverts per hour