The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Aug 13, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Aug 13, 2021

    Ambient office = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 117 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 125 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 147 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water =  137 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 145 – MIT Scientists And Commonwealth Fusion Systems Are Constructing Powerful New Magnets For Tokamaks – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 145 – MIT Scientists And Commonwealth Fusion Systems Are Constructing Powerful New Magnets For Tokamaks – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         I have been posts a lot of articles lately about the race to create commercial nuclear fusion. A lot of companies and institutions are taking part in the research. Last year, I posted about a spin-off from M.I.T.’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center called Commonwealth Fusion Systems. Today I am posting an update on their research.
         Researchers at M.I.T.’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center and engineers at the company, Commonwealth Fusion Systems, have started testing an extremely powerful magnet that is needed to trigger nuclear fusion to generate immense heat which can then be converted to electricity. It is one step on the path towards the creation of a commercial nuclear fusion reactor. Nuclear fusion is a desirable energy source because it can help mitigate climate change while producing no carbon dioxide or toxic waste.
         Despite decades of investment and aggressive promises, there has been no commercial payoff for fusion research. There is a long history of nuclear fusion research but, so far, scientists and engineers have yet to create a fusion system that will generate more power than it consumes.
         Though the necessary breakthroughs that are needed for commercial nuclear fusion reactors have not yet been achieved, it is still promoted as one of the possible paths to ending reliance on fossil fuels. Some researchers believe that fusion research could finally make that critical leap during this decade.
         More than two dozen private companies in the U.S., Europe, China and Australia as well as government-funded consortia in some countries are now investing heavily in efforts to construct commercial fusion reactors. Total investment in such research is approaching two billion dollars.
         Some of the startups and consortia are constructing powerful lasers to generate fusion reactions while others are exploring new kinds of fuel. Most of them say that they believe that they will be able to prove that their technology can generate competitively priced electricity by the end of  this decade. They claim that they will be able to construction commercial nuclear fusion power plants to send electricity to the power grids soon after 2030.
         Commonwealth’s revolutionary new magnet will be one of the most powerful in the world. It will be a critical component in compact nuclear fusion reactors called a Tokamaks. Tokamaks use magnetic fields to compress plasma until it is hotter than the center of the sun. Tokamaks are donut shaped reactors surrounded by magnets. They were first considered by Soviet scientists in the 1950s.
         Commonwealth claims that their magnet is a significant technological breakthrough that will make Tokamak designs commercial viable for the first time. They say that they are not yet ready to test their reactor prototype. Their researchers are just completing the new magnet and hope that it will be operational by 2025.
         The Commonwealth scientists hope that they will soon be able to generate a magnetic file that is almost twice the strength of the magnets that are planned for use by a global consortium of the European Union and six other countries who are assembling an experimental fusion reactor named ITER in Cadarache, France. The ITER consortium hopes to be able to generate electricity at the site by 2035.
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for Aug 12, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Aug 12, 2021

    Ambient office = 128 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 123 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 72 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 938 – Problems At The Utah Small Modular Reactors Project

    Nuclear Reactors 938 – Problems At The Utah Small Modular Reactors Project

         Energy sources are a major topic of discussion for U.S. municipalities. Critics of many proposed projects believe that when it comes to the use of public funds, taxpayers and communities of states such as Utah should not act as venture capitalists for risky bets on untried energy systems. The Utah Associate Municipal Power Systems (UAMPS) is recruiting towns and communities around the western U.S. to pay for a type of nuclear power referred to as small modular reactors (SMRs). If this project goes forward, the reactors will be constructed in southern Idaho.
         Last fall, seven Utah cities from Logan to Lehi withdrew their support for the UAMPS nuclear project because of the financial risks that their residents should not be asked to accept. However, many municipalities, such as Brigham City, Hyrum, Hurricane and Washington City are still willing to risk gambling with their taxpayer dollars.
         If SMRs are ready for market, then the private sector should show it by putting up its money. Governments should stay out of it especially when public funds are at risk. The participation commitments that UAMPS has been demanding from Utah communities that are interested in buying the SMR electricity require upfront payments from residents for a product that is full of uncertainty. Oregon-based NuScale is the developer of the SMRs but they have never built a plant like this before. The design keeps changing and it is almost a decade away from even being potentially operational. 
         Any investment of public dollars from those municipalities willing to gamble their money must be done in the open with public scrutiny. Unfortunately, the information exchange between UAMPS and its potential payers has been opaque. When information is provided, it is troubling. For example, the budget for the project has expanded from an initial estimate of three billion to a more recent estimate of six billion, It was only recently revealed that the company that was going to operate the plant, Energy Northwest, withdrew in March.
         In late June, UAMPS suddenly decided to reduce the number of SMRs at the planned power plant from twelve to six because they were struggling to get enough communities to commit to justify twelve units. This reduction led to a hike in the projected price that UAMPS had been promising which upset the still-participating municipalities.
         Plenty of Utah city council members have heard their constituents and have said “thanks but no thanks”. Bountiful, Kaysville, Murray, Lehi and Heber were some of biggest subscribers to the SMRs proposal but have since left the project. However, other municipalities remain official interested in this particular power project and are continuing their participation. If you reside in any of the communities still in the project, pay attention and watch your power bill. There may still be an opportunity to withdraw from the project.
         Utah municipalities should be conservative watchdogs of tax dollars. Prudent and transparent use of public money is acceptable. Unproven technology and murky promises that keep shifting are not acceptable. At this time, SMRs are a venture, not a product. Let private venture capital come in and pay for such projects, not Utah taxpayers.

  • Geiger Readings for Aug 11, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Aug 11, 2021

    Ambient office = 114 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 110 nanosieverts per hour

    Crimini mushrooms from Central Market = 121 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 89 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 75 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 937 – Virtual Reality Is An Excellent Training Tool For Nuclear Power Plant Operators – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 937 – Virtual Reality Is An Excellent Training Tool For Nuclear Power Plant Operators – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         Workers must be well trained in the operation and maintenance of nuclear fuel handling systems in a nuclear power plant. Safe handling of nuclear fuel rod assemblies is critical to ensure smooth functioning. However, the configuration of the fuel channels in the reactors is very complex and training the engineers in real environments can be difficult. Through computer simulations, VR provides a safe and highly realistic simulated environment where workers can learn about handling fuel without exposure to radiation or compromising the structural integrity of the reactor.
         Preparing for accidents and emergencies that could happen at a commercial nuclear power plant is a critical necessity. Laws in each nuclear-powered country require nuclear operating companies to develop and maintain emergency preparedness plans for their nuclear power plants to protect the public. However, planning and managing such training can consume a considerable amount of time and resources. This is one place where training in a simulated environment is important. Emergency situations such as loss of electricity supply, failure of emergency generators, failure of cooling systems or leaks can be recreated in a virtual environment for training and testing purposes. Virtual environments allow users to test the correct operation of the devices, tools and procedures that would be used in different emergency situations. It also helps to maintain the level of preparedness of the staff that would be involved in these emergencies.
         In addition, VR enables testing of the response time and the communication and decision-making skills of the teams in emergency situations that could not be created in real life. 
         Most of the nuclear industry still uses tradition training methods such as computer-based training, with limited sessions of on-site training. This means that engineers are not always certain about what needs to be done in real life in an actual environment.
         VR allows the creation and simulation of virtual worlds. These worlds immerse trainees in the virtual environment as if they were inside an actual nuclear power plant. In a VR environment, trainees can move around the simulated plant in complete safety. VR controllers allow the trainee to interact with virtual control panels, turbines and fuels in the simulated virtual world. This is not possible in real-life training. VR training results in higher reproducibility and safety. It is also cost-effective, since multiple sessions can be conducted at relatively low cost. Studies have indicated that VR-enabled training has improved the overall responsiveness of those working at nuclear power plants.
         The best aspect of VR is that it allows real-time collaboration and creates an accurate immersive environment. Assembly, operations, maintenance, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants training through VR can be used at all stages at a fraction of the costs of other options and in complete safety. The nuclear industry can use VR training to increase efficiency and maximize operations. It is a very safe way to train teams and attract young workers to the industry who may be familiar with VR from video games and entertainment.

  • Geiger Readings for Aug 10, 2021

    Geiger Readings for Aug 10, 2021

    Ambient office = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Peach from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 80 nanosieverts per hour