The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 03, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 03, 2024

    Ambient office = 90 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Beefsteak tomato from Central Market = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 83 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 92 – Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Is Developing A 3D Printing Process To Produce Fuel Capsules For Inertial Confinement Fusion

    Nuclear Fusion 92 – Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Is Developing A 3D Printing Process To Produce Fuel Capsules For Inertial Confinement Fusion

          Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) is researching the use of advanced 3D printing to mass-produce fuel capsules for fusion energy power plants. It could be a significant breakthrough in the field of fusion energy, which is considered the “Holy Grail” of clean and abundant power.
         The LLNL has already achieved a major breakthrough with the ignition inertial confinement fusion (ICF) ignition experiment in 2022. However, producing fusion energy on a commercial scale presents significant challenges.
         One of the biggest hurdles is the production of fuel capsules required for ICF. These capsules contain the deuterium and tritium fuel ignited by lasers.
         The fuel capsules must be nearly perfectly spherical. They currently take months to manufacture. A viable fusion power plant would require nearly a million of these capsules per day. As mentioned above, these capsules must be manufactured with extreme accuracy.
         The LLNL said in a press release that “The need for perfection is such that, if a NIF capsule were enlarged to the size of the Earth, an imperfection higher than the Hollywood sign in Los Angeles would be disqualifying.” To meet this challenge, LLNL has launched a research project to develop 3D-printed fuel capsules.
         Tammy Ma is the lead for LLNL’s inertial fusion energy institutional initiative. She said, “Now that we have achieved and repeated fusion ignition, the LLNL is rapidly applying our decades of know-how into solving the core physics and engineering challenges that come with the monumental task of building the fusion ecosystem necessary for a laser fusion power plant.”
         The project is developing the first prototype of a dual-wavelength, two-photon polymerization (DW-2PP) approach to 3D printing. This technique utilizes two different light sources to selectively print different materials. This allows the creation of complex geometries with sub-micron resolution, potentially enabling the production of fuel capsules at the scale required for a commercial fusion power plant.
         Xiaoxing Xia is co-principal investigator and a staff scientist in the LLNL’s Materials Engineering Division. He said, “We are focusing on a specific type of wetted-foam capsule, in which liquid DT can be wicked into a uniform foam layer on the inside of the spherical capsule by capillary action. “The current DT ice layering process takes up to a week to complete with extreme meticulousness. It’s possible that 3D printing is the only tool for this kind of complex geometry at scale.”
         The project has already shown promising results. 3D-printed targets have successfully been used in two NIF experiments in 2024. The use of 3D printing for fusion energy is still in its early stages. However, it represents a potential solution to a critical manufacturing challenge. If this new technology is successful, it could accelerate the development of fusion power plants. This could help bring the world closer to a future with clean, safe, and abundant energy.
         Jeff Wisoff is principal associate director for LLNL’s NIF & Photon Science Directorate. He said, “Unlocking fusion is a strategic asset for US competitiveness. It’s imperative that we invest in fundamental science and technology to build on the historic achievement of fusion ignition.”

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 02, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 02, 2024

    Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 69 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 61 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 01, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 01, 2024

    Ambient office = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 72 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Nov 30, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Nov 30, 2024

    Ambient office = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 91 nanosieverts per hour

    Yellow bell pepper from Central Market = 59 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 64 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 56 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 103 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 91 – Appleyard Lees Publishes A Report On Patents For Nuclear Technology.

    Nuclear Fusion 91 – Appleyard Lees Publishes A Report On Patents For Nuclear Technology.

         The increase in nuclear fusion innovation has continued for another year, according to the latest patent data reported by Appleyard Lees. However, nuclear power is a tale of two technologies with fission showing the lowest number of patent filings for more than sixty years.
         The fourth annual edition of the Inside Green Innovation: Progress Report from the leading intellectual property firm shows that the one hundred and sixty seven nuclear fusion patent filings in 2022 exceeded the one hundred and sixty five filings in 2021. The latter being an almost fifty percent increase on the previous high.
         Total funding in the nuclear fusion sector, according to the Fusion Industry Association, has reached more than seven billion dollars, with at least nine hundred million dollars in the past year.
         Adam Tindall is an Appleyard Lee Partner. He said, “It is too early to say whether this is now the new ‘steady state’ level for fusion patents, or the early stages of a sustained boom that will lead to real-world, widespread commercial application of a mature technology.”
         Recent patent applications in nuclear fusion have focused on less well-researched approaches to fusion, such as plasma generation including particle beam techniques and electrical discharge technologies.
         However, the focus on developing new magnet technologies continues. U.K. company Tokamak Energy is investing in a new business division for its magnet technology and continuing to be a top patent filer in the sector. Other top innovators for fusion technology now include the U.K. Atomic Energy Authority.
         With regard to territory, the growth of nuclear fusion technology start-up companies in the U.S. is now driving the increase in patent filings more than the previous acceleration led by Asian countries. There are a variety of smaller companies in the U.S. working on fusion research with no single organization dominating current fusion innovation.
         Matthew Bennett is an Associate at Appleyard Lees. He said, “As the sector matures, there will likely be consolidation around dominant organizations, with the winners of the innovation race benefiting from strong positions in the market, or at least from a healthy exit. The fusion sector is expanding rapidly and, even though the investment pot is generous, it will quickly be swallowed up by US companies which can show investors they have the necessary IP protections in place for commercializing their technology.”
         Patent filings for nuclear fission technology have reached a ten-year low. More than sixty percent fewer than in 2013 and the least recorded since 1963.
         Asian countries remain top patent filers in the technology, driven mainly by Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. and Hitachi GE Nuclear Energy. They are focusing on safety-related applications in emergency cooling, monitoring and testing and pressure suppression systems.
         The Inside Green Innovation: Progress Report – Fourth Edition’s focus on nuclear energy was selected because of its prominence in the global green innovation conversation. This involvement is referenced in the OECD’s and United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Green Innovation Database, a global innovation catalogue that connects needs for solving environmental or climate change problems with sustainable solutions.

    Inside Green Innovation: Progress Report