The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for April 15, 2024

    Geiger Readings for April 15, 2024

    Ambient office = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Hierloom tomato from Central Market = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 89 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for April 14, 2024

    Geiger Readings for April 14, 2024

    Ambient office = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Garlic from Central Market = 123 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for April 13, 2024

    Geiger Readings for April 13, 2024

    Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 126 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 128 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 90 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1370 – Corruption Grows In The Nuclear Industry

    Nuclear Reactors 1370 – Corruption Grows In The Nuclear Industry

         In their zeal to achieve a reduced carbon environment, Democrats have been promoting nuclear energy as a safe, clean energy source. Some states are moving as quickly as they can to reactivate idle reactors. In 2022, Congress passed the Inflation Relief Act (IRA) which contained a provision to provide thirty billion dollars for nuclear subsidies.
         Scandals involving bribery over nuclear energy have brought down high-level state officials and corporate executives in Ohio, Illinois and other places.
         In 2020, federal prosecutors presented charges against officials of Commonwealth Edison (ComEd), an Illinois company. They were charged with offering jobs and favors to friends of the Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives in exchange for a bill to bailout the company’s nuclear division.
         At about the same time, Ohio-based FirstEnergy executives were charged with paying sixty million dollars in bribes to state legislators.  Former Ohio Speaker of the House Larry Householder is currently serving a forty-seven-year prison sentence.
         Floodlight is a non-profit environmental news service. They published a piece in the liberal magazine Mother Jones that perfectly showcases the corruption in the nuclear industry. The article said, “Utility fraud and corruption—in Florida, Illinois, Mississippi, Ohio, and South Carolina—have cost electricity customers at least $6.6 billion, according to Floodlight’s analysis. Ratepayers have bankrolled nuclear plants that never got built, transmission systems that were over-engineered to beef up profits, and aging coal facilities that couldn’t compete with cheaper plants powered by methane, which the industry calls natural gas.”
         Before these scandals developed, and before Congress passed the Inflation Recovery Act, the nuclear industry had become so unpopular that it was a tempting target for political corruption.
         The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists said, “Changes in the economics of electricity markets are threatening the profitability of nuclear power plants, a shifting reality driving a demand for these financial bailouts. As the New Jersey-based energy company Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) explained in October 2020, across the nation “nuclear plants continue to struggle economically to survive. Since 2018, three nuclear plants have closed in the eastern US, all for economic reasons, and the impact has had a ripple effect.”
         Over the past few years, the U.S. Justice Department and the courts have carried out their jobs in prosecuting and sentencing bad actors in the nuclear industry. Now, it is time for Congress to investigate the root causes of the corruption. Executives and experts from the nuclear industry must be brought before congressional committees to explain why their industry has been allowed to fall into corruption at the expense of the taxpayer and the consumer.
         Congress must fulfill its investigative role and discover why this corruption keeps happening.  The first witness called to testify should be the Secretary of Energy, Jennifer Granholm. She should inform members of the House and Senate why uncompetitive nuclear plants are being propped up. If they cannot compete, they should be shuttered.
         The head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) should be pressed to give a full accounting of all nuclear reactors in the U.S. This account should include how many are in working order.
         Former Ohio Speaker Larry Householder should be brought before the committee in his prison jumpsuit to explain why bribery was thought to be a solution to inefficient energy.
         State governors should be asked to explain their plans for providing energy to their states if a particular source is no longer viable.
         The list of those responsible for the growth of corruption in the nuclear industry is long.  However, more needs to be done than simply punishing the criminals.  Congress must take the lead in finding out why an unreliable and dangerous energy source is ripe for corruption.

  • Geiger Readings for April 12, 2024

    Geiger Readings for April 12, 2024

    Ambient office = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 123 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 101 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1369 – Oklo Has Signed Letters Of Intent To Sell Power To Diamondback Energy And Equinix

    Nuclear Reactors 1369 – Oklo Has Signed Letters Of Intent To Sell Power To Diamondback Energy And Equinix

         Oil and gas producer Diamondback Energy Inc has signed a letter of intent (LoI) on a long-term power purchase agreement to use Oklo’s Aurora powerhouse reactors for its operations in the Permian Basin. Oklo has also signed a deal to supply up to five hundred megawatts of power to Equinix to serve its data centers in the U.S.
         The non-binding LoI with Diamondback outlines a proposed twenty-year power purchase agreement (PPA) focusing on using Aurora powerhouses to supply “reliable and emission-free electricity” to Diamondback’s operations in the Permian. According to the terms of the LoI, Oklo intends to license, construct, and operate powerhouse reactors capable of generating fifty megawatts of electric power to Diamondback E&P LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamondback near Midland, Texas.
         The LoI outlines options to renew and extend the potential power purchase agreement for an additional twenty-year term. Oklo’s powerhouse reactor designs are intended to be able to operate forty years. The company’s design-build-own-operate business model means potential customers like Diamondback can purchase power without complex ownership issues or other capital requirements, Oklo said.
    Jacob DeWitte is the Diamondback CEO. He said, “By developing and providing a low-cost, high-reliability, and emission-free energy source, Oklo is poised to help meet the growing energy requirements of operators like Diamondback.”
         Oklo has also recently signed a LoI to provide up to five hundred megawatts of power to Equinix, according to an April 2nd filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission by AltC Acquisition Corp. The LoI was executed on the 16th of February. Oklo is in the process of merging with AltC as part of its plans to go public. The coming merger was announced in July 2023.
         The LoI confirms Equinix’s interest in buying power from Oklo’s powerhouses to serve its data centers in the U.S. for a twenty-year according to the filing notes. The power purchase agreements would be renewable for further twenty-year terms. Equinix has made a twenty-five-million-dollar prepayment to Oklo. The filing says it is Permitted Equity Financing. Under the LoI, Equinix would have a right of first refusal for one hundred to five hundred megawatts of output from certain powerhouses for up to thirty-six months.
         Oklo was founded in 2013. It plans to commercialize its liquid metal fast reactor technology in the Aurora ‘powerhouse’. The Aurora is a fast neutron reactor using heat pipes to transport heat from the reactor core to a supercritical carbon dioxide power conversion system to generate electricity. Oklo has received a site use permit from the U.S. Department of Energy for a prototype unit to be constructed at the Idaho National Laboratory.
         In August of 2023, the U.S. Department of the Air Force, in partnership with the Defense Logistics Agency Energy, selected Oklo to site, design, build, own and operate a microreactor facility to deliver electricity and steam at the Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska. Subsequently, Eielson rescinded its Notice of Intent to Award pending the completion of further due diligence and a review of the vendor selection process by the Department of Justice. According to an update on the project issued in January of this year, the Department of the Air Force has said it still intends to meet the 2027 timeline for the project.