The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 15, 2022

    Geiger Readings for Jan 15, 2022

    Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 1090 nanosieverts per hour

    Tomato from Central Market = 137 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 109 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover sole = 108 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 838 – New Mexican Officials Are Challenging U.S. Department Of Energy Cleanup And Waste Disposal In Their State – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Radioactive Waste 838 – New Mexican Officials Are Challenging U.S. Department Of Energy Cleanup And Waste Disposal In Their State – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         Another area of concern to the N.M. officials and members of Congress is the fact that the DoE EM has been seeking to expand the scope of waste streams that can be sent to the WIPP. Kenny wrote in his letter that “The DOE revised its interpretation of the definition of ‘high level waste’ and developed a ‘dilute and dispose’ program to ship surplus plutonium from South Carolina to WIPP in a potential manipulation of NMED’s waste acceptance criteria as found in its state operating permit. “DOE failed to make progress in the clean-up of contamination as required by a 2016 Compliance Order on Consent. This failure continues despite the DOE EM’s congressionally approved budget for clean-up at this site.” NMED has permitting authority over both the LANL and the WIPP.
         The DoE responded to Kenney’s letter with the following statement. “The Department of Energy (DOE) takes seriously its responsibility for safely cleaning up transuranic (TRU) waste generator sites in support of our country’s national defense mission. Shipments are prioritized according to the availability of certified TRU waste that meets the WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). In accordance with the Land Withdrawal Act, TRU waste cannot be disposed of at the WIPP unless it meets strict characterization and certification guidelines established under the WAC with regulatory oversight by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED).” The DoE said that it will continue its transparency efforts. It also strongly encourages community engagement at all public meetings, including those that are hosted at the DoE’s Carlsbad Field Office.
         Kenney’s letter was a response to a December 2nd, 2021 letter from the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce calling for the GAO to carry out a program-wide review of “extreme management challenges” at the DoE EM. The DoE EM was added to the GAO’s High Risk List in 2017. It was still on that list at the time Kenney sent his letter.
         The Committee response letter said, “In an effort to assist us with our oversight of EM’s cleanup efforts, the Committee would like GAO to examine the major management challenges at EM that affect its ability to reduce its environmental liabilities and make progress on long standing high-risk areas.”
         The LANL has been a source of high concern in the past. They have been charged with sloppy handling of radioactive materials and inadequate documentation of radioactive waste shipped to the WIPP. A few years ago, they changed an absorbent without proper review of chemical reactions and shipped a barrel of treated waste to the WIPP. The barrel exploded in one of the underground chambers of the WIPP and radioactive materials leaked into the environment.
         The WIPP had to be shut down for several years while the damage to the underground chamber was repaired. No radioactive materials would have leaked from the WIPP if they had properly sealed the chamber and if their ventilation system had worked properly. The WIPP is operating again but problems at the WIPP are still being studied.

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 14, 2022

    Geiger Readings for Jan 14, 2022

    Ambient office = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Roma tomato from Central Market =112 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 103 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 837 – New Mexican Officials Are Challenging U.S. Department Of Energy Cleanup And Waste Disposal In Their State – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Radioactive Waste 837 – New Mexican Officials Are Challenging U.S. Department Of Energy Cleanup And Waste Disposal In Their State – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         According to an annual survey by United Van Lines, people from around the U.S. are moving to New Mexico. U-Haul is currently constructing a three-story ninety thousand square-foot facility in Los Lunas in anticipation of the movement of many more people into N.M. Amazon and Netflix have big plans for growth in the state. Colorado is an example of the effect that legalization of recreational and medicinal cannabis can have on migration, transplants from around the U.S. may be moving in large numbers to N.M. drawn by cannabis laws.
         Unfortunately, people and businesses are not the only things moving into N.M. in greater quantities. N.M. could be the destination for a lot of nuclear waste from out of state. N.M. officials are not pleased by this prospect.
         N.M. officials and members of Congress are seeking stronger oversight of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). They have called on federal officials to review alleged problems with the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) environmental cleanup operations.
         James Kenney is New Mexico’s Secretary of the Environment. He sent a letter to the federal Government Accountability Office (GAO) expressing his concerns about operations at the WIPP. He is calling for the federal office to increase its oversight of the nuclear waste repository near Carlsbad.
         The House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce (Committee) has requested the Government Accountability Office (GAO) examine management challenges and other issues at the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM). They have requested that the GAO review four areas specific to the EM mission. These include (1) DoE Program Management, (2) Minimum safety requirements, (3) Soil and groundwater contamination and (4) Coordination with stakeholders.
         Kenny wrote that “The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) strongly supports such a review (requested by the above Committee) and would like to directly share our experiences regarding DOE EM with GAO staff regarding delays in legacy waste clean-up at LANL and the lack of transparency related to the prioritization of shipments to WIPP.”
         Low-level transuranic (TRU) waste from around the U.S. is disposed of at the WIPP via burial in an abandoned salt mine about two thousand feed underground. The TRU elements are all unstable and they decay into other elements. The DoE and its EM owns and operates the WIPP but is permitted and regulated by NMED which is headed by Kenny.
         Kenney’s letter to the DoE asked them to review nuclear programs in New Mexico. This includes the prioritization of nuclear waste shipments to the WIPP from facilities outside of N.M. Kenny stated that the first priority should be given to waste from the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in northern N.M. as the DoE has announced plans to increase the production of plutonium pits there.
        Kenney alleges that DoE EM has entered into legally binding settlement agreements with states to prioritize waste shipments to the WIPP at the expense of shipments from other states, including N.M. He said, “The practice of DOE EM solely managing waste shipments to WIPP from around the U.S. without first discussing with New Mexico stakeholders – including NMED as its regulator – now merits immediate congressional oversight.”
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 13, 2022

    Geiger Readings for Jan 13, 2022

    Ambient office = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 103 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Romaine lettuce from Central Market = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 109 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 836 – Supreme Court To Review Decision Of Ninth Circuit Court With Respect To Washington State Workers Compensation

    Radioactive Waste 836 – Supreme Court To Review Decision Of Ninth Circuit Court With Respect To Washington State Workers Compensation

         The U.S. Supreme Court has announced that it will consider the federal government’s challenge to a Washington state worker’s compensation law in a case that could have costly consequence for U.S. government contracts involving hazardous work on federal property.
         The justices agreed last Monday to review a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision which upholds a Washington state law that presumes that certain worker health conditions linked to cleanup work at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation are occupational diseases that can trigger workers’ compensation. The Reservation is a decommissioned federal nuclear production complex.
         Since 1989, the Department of Energy (DoE) has overseen the cleanup at the Hanford site. Weapons-grade plutonium for use in the U.S. nuclear program was produced at Hanford during World War II and the Cold War. The cleanup project at Hanford is expected to continue over the next sixty years and will involve about four hundred department employees and ten thousand contractors and subcontractors.
         In 2018, Washington state legislators passed HB 1723 that amended the state’s workers’ compensation law exclusive to the Reservation. The amended law covers at least one hundred thousand current and former federal contract workers who performed services at the Reservation over the past eighty years. The law states that presumed occupational diseases stemming from work at the Reservation should trigger benefits eligibility, including cancers and other respiratory diseases.
         The federal government argued in court that the law exposes government contractors, and by extension, the U.S. government to “massive new costs” that similarly situated state and private employers do not incur.
         The U.S. Justice Department requested that the Supreme Court take up the case. They argued that the 2018 law discriminated against the U.S. federal government and that the state law should not apply to federal contract workers at the Reservation. The U.S. government warned that the logic applied by a panel of Ninth Circuit judges opened the door to other states passing legislation targeting work at federal facilities.
         The Justice Department argued that “Congress did not permit States to adopt laws that impose unique burdens on the United States and the firms that it engages to carry out federal functions. The practical consequences of the panel’s mistake are far-reaching. Even if the Hanford site is considered in isolation, the decision is likely to cost the United States tens of millions of dollars annually for the remainder of the 21st century.”
         Attorneys for Washington state responded that the courts have allowed states to regulate workers’ compensation for injuries or illnesses suffered during work on federal land. They argued that “Washington state has “long tailored its workers’ compensation laws to the dangers faced by particular employees.” They noted statutes that protect firefighters and other workers facing special hazards.
         Washington state attorneys argued that “Hanford is a uniquely dangerous workplace, filled with radioactive and toxic chemicals, and private contractors operating there have routinely failed to provide employees with protective equipment and to monitor their exposures to toxic substances.”
         Justice Department attorneys also argued that the Ninth Circuit ruling clashed with a Supreme Court precedent in a 1988 decision, Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. Miller. This case described a similar situation of a state worker’s compensation award for an employee injured at a federally owned facility.
         The full Ninth Circuit previously declined to take up the Washington state case. They said that the Washington law fell properly within a part of federal law that authorizes states to apply their workers’ compensation laws to federal projects.

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 12, 2022

    Geiger Readings for Jan 12, 2022

    Ambient office = 67 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 91 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Red onion from Central Market = 90 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 107 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 91 nanosieverts per hour